<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for God3&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The blog that specialises in Theology,Intelligent design,Science and everything inbetween!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The blind leading the blind by fajerwerki sklep</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6013</link>
		<dc:creator>fajerwerki sklep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6013</guid>
		<description>interesting blog, bookmarked for the future referrence,  what template do you use ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting blog, bookmarked for the future referrence,  what template do you use ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The blind leading the blind by reality kings</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6012</link>
		<dc:creator>reality kings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6012</guid>
		<description>Amazing article, its true, im sure that you have really really true...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing article, its true, im sure that you have really really true&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The blind leading the blind by earn extra money</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6007</link>
		<dc:creator>earn extra money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6007</guid>
		<description>Nice work, interesting blog, keep us posting, if you want click here and learn how to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl3WMeH2vXc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;earn money fast&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, interesting blog, keep us posting, if you want click here and learn how to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl3WMeH2vXc" rel="nofollow">earn money fast</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The blind leading the blind by zdrowe odchudzanie</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>zdrowe odchudzanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/the-blind-leading-the-blind/#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, your blog is awsome, bookmarked, regards biurkosram
&lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.o2.pl/temat.php?id_p=5898787&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skuteczne odchudzanie&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, your blog is awsome, bookmarked, regards biurkosram<br />
<a href="http://forum.o2.pl/temat.php?id_p=5898787" rel="nofollow">skuteczne odchudzanie</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by Mike Godfrey</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/about-me/#comment-5995</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Godfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/about-me/#comment-5995</guid>
		<description>Hi James,
thanks for the offer -the funny thing is I saw your book in waterstones  and am thinking of buying it :)It looks interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,<br />
thanks for the offer -the funny thing is I saw your book in waterstones  and am thinking of buying it <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> It looks interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by John Waring</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/about-me/#comment-5990</link>
		<dc:creator>John Waring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/about-me/#comment-5990</guid>
		<description>Happy birthday Mike. Have a great Jesus filled day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy birthday Mike. Have a great Jesus filled day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by James Hannam</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/about-me/#comment-5989</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hannam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/about-me/#comment-5989</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

Please could you get in touch.  I&#039;ve got a book out and wanted to send you a copy, if you are interested.

Best wishes

James

bede@bede.org.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>Please could you get in touch.  I&#8217;ve got a book out and wanted to send you a copy, if you are interested.</p>
<p>Best wishes</p>
<p>James</p>
<p><a href="mailto:bede@bede.org.uk">bede@bede.org.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50 degrees North,1 degree West by Bill</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2006/05/30/50-degrees-north1-degreewest/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2006/05/30/50-degrees-north1-degreewest/#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/anh-nguoi-dep/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; anh nguoi dep &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/cow-breeds/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; cow breeds &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/gamegoo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; gamegoo &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/download-sonic-characters-for-mugen/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; download sonic characters for mugen &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/eye-parts/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; eye parts &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/annas-linens/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; annas linens &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/origami-for-kids/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; origami for kids &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/states-and-capitols/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; states and capitols &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/mugen-char-for/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; mugen char for &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/klove-radio/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; klove radio &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/anh-nguoi-dep/" rel="nofollow"> anh nguoi dep </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/cow-breeds/" rel="nofollow"> cow breeds </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/gamegoo/" rel="nofollow"> gamegoo </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/download-sonic-characters-for-mugen/" rel="nofollow"> download sonic characters for mugen </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/eye-parts/" rel="nofollow"> eye parts </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/annas-linens/" rel="nofollow"> annas linens </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/origami-for-kids/" rel="nofollow"> origami for kids </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/states-and-capitols/" rel="nofollow"> states and capitols </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/mugen-char-for/" rel="nofollow"> mugen char for </a><br />
<a href="http://ceqezozezo.vndv.com/klove-radio/" rel="nofollow"> klove radio </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Agent Big by Mike Godfrey</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/agent-big/#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Godfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/?p=351#comment-5983</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,
Yep  we could use the multiverse idea as a means  of explaining away the anthropic principle- which I think is why the multiverse idea was postulated in the first place.
There are problems with it apart from its speculative nature -William lane craig says :

&#039;Roger Penrose of Oxford University has calculated that the odds of our universe’s low entropy condition obtaining by chance alone are on the order of 1:1010(123), an inconceivable number.  If our universe were but one member of a multiverse of randomly ordered worlds, then it is vastly more probable that we should be observing a much smaller universe.  For example, the odds of our solar system’s being formed instantly by the random collision of particles is about 1:1010(60), a vast number, but inconceivably smaller than 1010(123).  (Penrose calls it “utter chicken feed” by comparison [The Road to Reality (Knopf, 2005), pp. 762-5]).  Or again, if our universe is but one member of a multiverse, then we ought to be observing highly extraordinary events, like horses’ popping into and out of existence by random collisions, or perpetual motion machines, since these are vastly more probable than all of nature’s constants and quantities’ falling by chance into the virtually infinitesimal life-permitting range.  Observable universes like those strange worlds are simply much more plenteous in the ensemble of universes than worlds like ours and, therefore, ought to be observed by us if the universe were but a random member of a multiverse of worlds.  Since we do not have such observations, that fact strongly disconfirms the multiverse hypothesis.  On naturalism, at least, it is therefore highly probable that there is no multiverse.&#039;

There are so many things to my mind that show that God is there from looking at natural theology,apart from special revelation,that there is a coherence between special revelation and the world around us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,<br />
Yep  we could use the multiverse idea as a means  of explaining away the anthropic principle- which I think is why the multiverse idea was postulated in the first place.<br />
There are problems with it apart from its speculative nature -William lane craig says :</p>
<p>&#8216;Roger Penrose of Oxford University has calculated that the odds of our universe’s low entropy condition obtaining by chance alone are on the order of 1:1010(123), an inconceivable number.  If our universe were but one member of a multiverse of randomly ordered worlds, then it is vastly more probable that we should be observing a much smaller universe.  For example, the odds of our solar system’s being formed instantly by the random collision of particles is about 1:1010(60), a vast number, but inconceivably smaller than 1010(123).  (Penrose calls it “utter chicken feed” by comparison [The Road to Reality (Knopf, 2005), pp. 762-5]).  Or again, if our universe is but one member of a multiverse, then we ought to be observing highly extraordinary events, like horses’ popping into and out of existence by random collisions, or perpetual motion machines, since these are vastly more probable than all of nature’s constants and quantities’ falling by chance into the virtually infinitesimal life-permitting range.  Observable universes like those strange worlds are simply much more plenteous in the ensemble of universes than worlds like ours and, therefore, ought to be observed by us if the universe were but a random member of a multiverse of worlds.  Since we do not have such observations, that fact strongly disconfirms the multiverse hypothesis.  On naturalism, at least, it is therefore highly probable that there is no multiverse.&#8217;</p>
<p>There are so many things to my mind that show that God is there from looking at natural theology,apart from special revelation,that there is a coherence between special revelation and the world around us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Agent Big by Paul</title>
		<link>http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/agent-big/#comment-5982</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 07:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluorescentflicker.wordpress.com/?p=351#comment-5982</guid>
		<description>Well, yes, I agree with you. But on the other hand, we could call it the multiverse, or a quantum fluctuation.

Materialism has had a hard time of it recently, though. The universe is not eternal. Life isn&#039;t fundamentally simple, or common in the universe. The earth isn&#039;t just a pale blue dot. None of that proves logically that there is a god of the sort talked about in the Bible, but what has happened is that materialism has failed to prove that such a god is unlikely, &quot;God Delusion&quot; notwithstanding. In fact, as a demonstration of the intellectual bankruptcy of materialism, Dawkins&#039; book hits the spot nicely!

So philosophy and what we might call &quot;general revelation&quot; open the possibility up that there might be an external agent which transcends the universe. But if you want to know God is there, you have to look for evidence that he/she/it has made himself known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, I agree with you. But on the other hand, we could call it the multiverse, or a quantum fluctuation.</p>
<p>Materialism has had a hard time of it recently, though. The universe is not eternal. Life isn&#8217;t fundamentally simple, or common in the universe. The earth isn&#8217;t just a pale blue dot. None of that proves logically that there is a god of the sort talked about in the Bible, but what has happened is that materialism has failed to prove that such a god is unlikely, &#8220;God Delusion&#8221; notwithstanding. In fact, as a demonstration of the intellectual bankruptcy of materialism, Dawkins&#8217; book hits the spot nicely!</p>
<p>So philosophy and what we might call &#8220;general revelation&#8221; open the possibility up that there might be an external agent which transcends the universe. But if you want to know God is there, you have to look for evidence that he/she/it has made himself known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
