Archive for August, 2007

J. Gresham Machen

Posted: August 20, 2007 in Theo/Philo

J. Gresham Machen (1881-1937), was a Princeton theologian,whom I first heard about via Francis Schaeffer’s last book: ‘The Great Evangelical disaster’.
Here is a quote from an essay ‘Christianity and Culture’ written in 1912, where Machen rightly observes that  the battle ground for Christianity is located in the realm of ideas:

jgmachen.jpeg

‘During the last thirty years there has been a tremendous defection from the Christian Church. It is evidenced even by things that lie on the surface. For example, by the decline in church attendance and in Sabbath observance and in the number of candidates for the ministry.

Special explanations, it is true, are sometimes given for these discouraging tendencies. But why should we deceive ourselves, why comfort ourselves by palliative explanations? Let us face the facts. The falling off in church attendance, the neglect of Sabbath observance—these things are simply surface indications of a decline in the power of Christianity. Christianity is exerting a far less powerful direct influence in the civilized world today than it was exerting thirty years ago.
What is the cause of this tremendous defection? For my part, I have little hesitation in saying that it lies chiefly in the intellectual sphere. Men do not accept Christianity because they can no longer be convinced that Christianity is true. It may be useful, but is it true? Other explanations, of course, are given. The modern defection from the Church is explained by the practical materialism of the age. Men are so much engrossed in making money that they have no time for spiritual things.
That explanation has a certain range of validity. But its range is limited. It applies perhaps to the boom towns of the West, where men are intoxicated by sudden possibilities of boundless wealth. But the defection from Christianity is far broader than that. It is felt in the settled countries of Europe even more strongly than in America. It is felt among the poor just as strongly as among the rich. Finally it is felt most strongly of all in the universities, and that is only one indication more that the true cause of the defection is intellectual. To a very large extent, the students of our great Eastern universities—and still more the universities of Europe—are not Christians. And they are not Christians often just because they are students. The thought of the day, as it makes itself most strongly felt in the universities, is profoundly opposed to Christianity, or at least it is out of connection with Christianity. The chief obstacle to the Christian religion today lies in the sphere of the intellect.’

Advertisements

Do atheists believe in Magic?

Posted: August 14, 2007 in Theo/Philo

 

7289531.jpg

Professor Kai Nielsen:

“Suppose you hear a loud bang…and you ask me, ‘What made that bang?’ and I reply, ‘Nothing, it just happened.’ You would not accept that.”

What answer do atheists give for the cause of the biggest bang,the creation of the universe?

If the answer atheists would give is there is no prior cause , should they accept that?

Do they believe that the universe had a cause, in accordance with the cause and effect premise of logic ?

If so what is it?

If not, then did the universe just pop into being like magic ?

Its my Birthday…to celebrate heres a clip of Dawkins appently lost for words:

Although the question I think, could of been framed better -I have yet to come upon clear cut examples of new information arriving in the genome leading to an increase in function-without the accompanying loss of function elsewhere,my witness Bacterial antibiotic resistance

The question is:

“Can you give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the geneome?

Some other guy things the best  answer of an example of increased information is  Downs syndrome, because Chromosome 21 is repeated ,and yes hes right ,but what I think the question was on about was new information  leading to new function.